Lodestone as an IDI alternative.
idiCORE has a real following among investigators and collections shops. Here is where we differ.
Bureau coverage, and a source on every record.
Credit header from Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, Innovis and other bureaus, with public records.
Run subjects you already know through both and compare. Here every record shows its source, rather than one merged identity presented as fact.
Confidence, and a purpose record per search.
The access agreement
It sets out permissible purpose and data-handling obligations.
Confidence is rated, never asserted as verification
One source is single; two or more agreeing is corroborated. Neither is called verified until a person confirms it.
Purpose recorded per search
Every search records its purpose and matter reference. Uncredentialed searches do not run, and are still logged.
Bank and brokerage location is not offered
No search returns it.
Common questions
How does Lodestone Data compare with idiCORE?
Both start from nationwide credit header. The differences are alternative-bureau coverage, permissible purpose declared per session and written onto every search, and self-serve audit export.
Run both on the same subjects.
Read the two side by side.